5 results found.

Observer Desk

Posted on 01.02.18 by

AADHAAR ACT CASE: Day 6 ARGUMENTS

On 01.02.2018, the 5 Judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra, and Justices A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan continued hearing the Aadhaar Act case (Puttaswamy v UOI), to decide the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act. On the 5th day of arguments, Mr. Shyam Divan had assailed the Aadhaar programme for creating an architecture capable of citizen surveillance…. Read More

Observer Desk

Posted on 30.01.18 by

AADHAAR ACT CASE: Day 5 ARGUMENTS

On 30.01.2018,  the 5 Judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra, and Justices A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan continued hearing the Aadhaar Act case (Puttaswamy v UOI), to decide the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act. On the 4th day, Mr. Shyam Divan had started his argument on the capability of surveillance by the State using the Aadhaar… Read More

Observer Desk

Posted on 18.01.18 by

Aadhaar Act Case: Day 2 Arguments

On 18.1.2018,  the 5 Judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan continued with the hearings in the Aadhaar Act case (Puttaswamy v UOI)  The case will decide the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act. On the first day of the case, Mr. Shyam Divan representing the petitioners made broad… Read More

Observer Desk

Posted on 17.01.18 by

Aadhaar Act Case : Day 1 Arguments.

On 17.1.2018, the 5 Judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan began hearings in the Aadhaar Act case (Puttaswamy v UOI). There are 27 petitions which have challenged various facets of Aadhaar regime and this case will decide the constitutionality of each of these facets. Senior Counsel Shyam Divan representing the petitioners… Read More

Observer Desk

Posted on 19.07.17 by

Aadhar and The Right to Privacy – 9 Judge Bench: Day 1 Arguments (Arvind Datar)

Mr. Arvind Datar began his arguments by denying that MP Sharma & Ors. vs. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi & Ors. (1954) or Kharak Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (1962) held that the right to privacy is not a fundamental right. M.P. Sharma dealt with a challenge to search and seizure of incriminating documents from company offices under Article 19(1)(f)… Read More