SLP (C) 804/2017

Whatsapp-Facebook Privacy Case

Case Description

Karmanya Singh and Shreya Sethi, two Whatsapp Users, have challenged the data sharing policy of Whatsapp with Facebook. This case will decide if such data sharing violates citizens' Right to Privacy.


Karmanya Singh, 19, and Shreya Sethi, 22, filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court challenging the 2016 privacy policy of Whatsapp. They voiced an urgent need to protect the data of Indians who use internet messaging applications such as Whatsapp. They argued that, by sharing private data of its users with Facebook and all its group companies , Whatsapp threatens the right to privacy of its users.

In 2014, Whatsapp was bought by Facebook. Whatsapp acknowledged that their privacy policy will not change. Yet, in August 2016, Whatsapp announced a change in their privacy policy. The new policy says that account information of users would be shared with Facebook after 25th September 2016. This was when Karmanya Singh and Shreya Sethi, decided to challenge the privacy policy in the Delhi High Court.

On 23rd September 2016, a Divisional bench of the Delhi High Court rejected the petition. The Court, however, directed Whatsapp to delete the data, until 25th September 2016, of users who choose to delete the application as well as users who choose to retain the application on the mobile phones. However, information shared via Whatsapp messenger after 25th September was allowed to be shared under the new policy. It held that it is always open to the existing users of Whatsapp who do not want to share their information to delete their accounts.

Thereafter, the petitioners filed an SLP at the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court judgment. A Constitutional is to be constituted to decide on the matter.


  1. Whether the Privacy policy of August 2016 of WhatsApp violates the Right to Privacy of users.
  2. Whether not providing an option to the user of not sharing data with Facebook is contrary to law.


Latest Hearing

Judgment Pending

5-Judge bench partly heard arguments on maintainability of the case. W.P.(C) No. 347 of 2017 tagged with the matter. Posted on 20th November, 2017.


Thank you for your feedback!